3 Strategies for Getting a Promotion

3 Strategies for Getting a Promotion You’ve made yourself indispensable. You’re everybody’s go-to worker bee. There’s no project too difficult, no task too daunting for you, no crisis you can’t fix!   The trouble is, you feel like you’re doing the work of three people, but only getting the credit for your position. Even if there’s simply no room in the budget to give you a raise right now, it is possible to have your new responsibilities more accurately reflected in your job title. It’s not a silly thing to want your title to sum up what you do; this will make it much easier to represent yourself on your resume and on networking platforms like LinkedIn.Here are three guidelines to steer you in your quest for a title bump.1. Choose wiselyIt’s tempting to choose a trendy title like â€Å"Bliss Doula† or â€Å"Marketing Ninja,† but kitschy names like this can actually hurt your career. Choose a title that, while not boring, accurately represents your responsibilities, experience, and skills, and then sex it up only as much as you can without appearing ridiculous. The trick is to broadcast to the professional world exactly how capable you are- not to win any self-branding contests.2. Know your momentThere are good times and bad times to ask for a title bump- even one that’s totally deserved. If your extra work, the stuff you feel is â€Å"above and beyond,† could still reasonably fall under the clause in your job description that says â€Å"Other duties as required,† then chances are your boss or HR manager isn’t going to go for a title change. Wait until you have a really convincing argument. Document the scope of extra work you’re doing- particularly if you’ve taken over responsibilities from other positions.3. Make your caseIf you can show the extra weight you’re bearing, then you’ll have a much better time convincing the powers-that-be to give you that sexy title u pdate- and the prestige and swagger that come with it, even if only in your head.Go into the meeting prepared. Have a revised, written version of your job description that you can compare with the job description when you were hired. Compare your current duties to other positions within the company, or in the field. If you can prove you’re doing what the market recognizes as falling under a better title, any reasonable HR department will hear you out. Feel free to bring in research from GlassDoor or LinkedIn to help seal the deal.Whether or not you succeed, if you’re really going above and beyond, it might be time to ask. And if your higher-ups aren’t willing to recognize and reward you for the work you’re actually doing, that’s always a good thing to know.

Catcher in the ryedoes voice matter essays

Catcher in the ryedoes voice matter essays How important is the voice that tells a story? It seems almost trivial to claim that the same story can change because of the voice telling it to you. Does the voice and point of view of the narrator play a large enough role in a novel to change the attitude of the reader about the novel? J.D.. Salinger uses the dominant character of Holden Caulfield to be the first person narrator of his novel The Catcher in the Rye. The key to Holdens narrative voice is the fact that it added life and a connection to the character. This voice transforms an otherwise lifeless story to a jump start and electric novel. In order to find out how important this narrator was to the story we will compare the novel The Catcher in the Rye to the piece A Slight Rebellion of Madison(the summary of the very same novel as In looking at the importance of Holdens role we will first look at the summary of the novel. In Slight Rebellion off Madison the character of Holden Caulfield has been eliminated and an outside third person narrator replaces him. This version goes through the story explaining the basic outlining of The Catcher in the Rye. The outline is what the summary gives to the reader and thats all it gives. The basic plot is average, but with out the connection to the reader it keeps the reader on the outside through the whole thing. The plot tells the happenings of a young man named Holden Caulfield, but without really knowing to much about the character of Holden the plot line is lifeless and boring for the reader. We see the experiences that Holden goes through, but the reader doesnt get involved. It is hard for most readers to sympathize with Holden therefore Salinger relies on the connection Holden makes with the reader to get the reader involved in the life ...

Philosophy of life Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Philosophy of life - Essay Example Working with such famous philosophers as Aristotle, Immanuel Kant and Bernard Russell helps to investigate some interesting philosophical problems, make your own conclusions and answer your own questions. The main questions expressed in this work concern the existence of absolute criteria of good and evil, right and wrong. â€Å"Absolute† means that these criteria are universal and do not depend upon the point of view of the estimator and can be viewed from different angles. This work researches concrete examples and compares them with the standard way of judgment and sorting out the expression of human nature. The existence or absence of absolute criteria of good and evil depends upon the frame of philosophical system they are being searched in. They cannot be observed separately, taking out from a particular system. There are a lot of examples which are double-barreled. A rubber on the road stole a large bag of money from a man. On the one hand, from the robber’s point of view this action is considered as â€Å"good† because he can use the stolen money for his own needs and pleasures. On the other hand, from the victim’s point of view it is considered as â€Å"evil† definitely, because he was kept out of his honestly earned money. In this example the concept of â€Å"good† and â€Å"evil† is relative. There were very few philosophers in the history who created integral and logically finished systems. Here such names as Emmanuel Kant, Platon, Georg Hegel and Arthur Schopenhauer can be mentioned. Some of their arguments are disputable, some of them weren’t proved but in general their system is logically complete. While analyzing it we can notice one very interesting principle. If the philosophical system is complete, then one of its thesis is followed by another one and so forth. It is impossible to take one of its statements and reject another one. At the heart of any system there are always some axioms which do not come from other thesis